March 05, 2004

Gates: "Buy" stamps to send e-mail

...the sender would "buy" postage by devoting maybe 10 seconds of computing time to solving a math puzzle. The exercise would merely serve as proof of the sender's good faith.

Some proposals even allow recipients to set their own rates. A college student might accept e-mail with a one-cent stamp; a busy chief executive might demand a dollar.

"In the regular marketplace, when you have something so fast and efficient that everyone wants it, the price goes up," said Sonia Arrison of the Pacific Research Institute, a think tank that favors market-based approaches.

"To think the Internet can shatter class distinctions that exist offline is "living in Fantasyland," Arrison said.

damn Marxist e-mail users. Shame on you all.

via CNN

Posted by brad at March 5, 2004 01:39 PM

Comments

I see this evolving into a two-tier system on the user's end: allow free incoming email from permitted addresses, charge a fee for those of unknown origin. A long lost (i.e. not on the list)friend might have to pay once but I could reverse the charge and put them on my list. Fees would discourage mass mailing. Let a spammer pay me for access to my mailbox. (Earn money while working at home....)

Posted by: pw at March 6, 2004 09:45 AM

Ultimately, some sort of 'sender pays' system is probably the right way to go (Eric Allman recently wrote a good article on the Economics of Spam: http://www.acmqueue.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=108 ), however I see Gates' specific proposal as being rather problematic, both w/ the technical aspects assymetric scaling of processing time and the huge number of zombies/botnets, and also the general functional aspects: how does this affect mailing lists, sales emails, etc.

Honestly though, does anyone really think it's a good idea to allow arbitrary 3rd party code to be running on your computer so you can send email?

(BTW, modern-day spam just turned 10 ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/36062.html ). Can't wait to see its unruly teenage years. [for more interesting spam history: http://www.templetons.com/brad/spamterm.html ])

Posted by: lhl at March 6, 2004 01:45 PM

Faceroll

Erin Dinehart
2nd Year
Nov 18 @ 5:04AM

Anne Balsamo
Faculty
Nov 16 @ 9:39AM

Perry Hoberman
Faculty
Nov 11 @ 2:04PM

Michael Naimark
Faculty
Nov 8 @ 1:03PM

Mark Bolas
Faculty
Nov 1 @ 5:55PM

Scott Fisher
Director
Oct 26 @ 8:38PM

Marientina Gotsis
Staff
Oct 23 @ 11:22AM

Peggy Weil
Faculty
Oct 15 @ 1:51PM

Jessica Rosenblatt
1st Year
Oct 8 @ 3:53PM

Peter Brinson
Faculty
Oct 7 @ 1:06PM

Tracy Fullerton
Faculty
Oct 6 @ 12:17PM

Susana Ruiz
3rd Year
Oct 5 @ 12:26PM

Michael Steffen
2nd Year
Oct 2 @ 1:16PM

Vincent Diamante
1st Year
Sep 25 @ 9:49PM

Noah Keating
1st Year
Sep 25 @ 10:28AM

Justin Hall
1st Year
Sep 11 @ 6:18PM

Jenova Chen
2nd Year
Aug 12 @ 12:48AM

Victoria Moran
1st Year
Apr 17 @ 11:51AM

Will Carter
3rd Year
Mar 3 @ 3:35PM

Kellee Santiago
2nd Year
Feb 16 @ 4:22PM

Chris Swain
Faculty
Feb 4 @ 6:44PM

Jen Stein
Staff
Jan 30 @ 1:10PM

Todd Furmanski
3rd Year
Dec 16 @ 12:13PM

Yuechuan Ke
1st Year
Sep 7 @ 5:15PM

Brad Newman
2nd Year
Mar 6 @ 4:39PM

Mihai Peteu
1st Year
Sep 18 @ 10:09AM

Aaron Meyers
1st Year
May 30 @ 12:47PM

Josh Green
1st Year
Mar 29 @ 2:24PM

Doo-Yul Park
1st Year
Jan 30 @ 5:44PM

Kurt MacDonald
3rd Year
Oct 17 @ 11:54PM

Tripp Millican
3rd Year
Oct 4 @ 3:08PM

Andrew Sacher
2nd Year
Jun 28 @ 10:02AM

Julie Dillon
2nd Year
Feb 15 @ 3:50PM

Erik Nelson
1st Year
Feb 2 @ 6:12PM

Herb Yang
1st Year
Dec 13 @ 2:00AM

Mike Brinker
3rd Year
Oct 20 @ 7:38PM

Shelby Wong
1st Year
Mar 18 @ 6:23PM

Ashley York
2nd Year
Mar 2 @ 10:47PM

Stephanie Weinstein
3rd Year
Feb 15 @ 11:43AM

Anita Stokes
1st Year
Nov 12 @ 3:11PM

Michael Lew
Faculty
Oct 7 @ 2:21PM

Fred Stimpson
Faculty
Sep 8 @ 10:20PM

Erik Loyer
Faculty
Mar 21 @ 8:36PM

Julian Bleecker
Faculty

Eddo Stern
Faculty

Jacki Morie
Faculty