While no lawyer, I've worked on a few videogame contracts, full-time positions, and written briefly about IP for negotiating a contract. So I find Jim Charne's conclusions reassuringly counter to the rumors that sometimes surface in the labs about a school, especially to whom we pay a high premium, owning our work. If anything, rather than asking if a student owns his labor for which he paid the privilege of sharing it with others, since we are paying the school, the more fair question is: Who owns the teachers' and administrators' work? Do the students (or their financiers), the collective clients that the school serves?
And yet it would be mean-spirited to ask such. No less mean-spirited is the question that the school snatch up the work from those who are sharing their ideas in its halls. I have heard in the cinema school there might be a case in which the school is investing heavily into a project, but unless there is equitable compensation, transferal of ownership seems like double payment (first in collecting the fees from us and second in taking the freedom to use).
Comments (1)
Today I see this continuation of Jim's topic on Gamasutra (http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3849/controversy_in_the_classroom_.php). With two dozen articulate comments ensuing.
And Ian Schreiber asks on the IGDA education list:
In the USC School of Cinema and the Interactive Media Division, I've heard conflicting opinions from students and teachers. Since I've personally invested the last year and a half of my labor at HOME using FREELY available software to construct my thesis, I wanted a clearer answer. According to the USC IP policies (http://policies.usc.edu/policies/intellectualproperty040301.pdf), all students own their own work unless: 1) USC paid them, 2) it was a film or music, or 3) facilities were used to make the work (e.g., shoot a film on their stage with their equipment).
That was better than the rumors, but still troubling what "significant" means, especially in the context of software. USC has full film production facilities, where you could make a film here. But it's software production facilities are not comprehensive.
The FAQ (http://policies.usc.edu/policies/IPPQ_A_102201.pdf) reiterates and covers a bit more.
Even though I don't plan to commercialize my thesis (I'm in school to learn), and think that aiming to sell a game from within school is oftentimes counterproductive to learning game design: I don't agree with those policies in full, and personally, I am operating under the fair and reasonable belief that my effort is my own.
Posted by kennerly
|
November 14, 2008 1:32 PM
Posted on November 14, 2008 13:32