" /> Michael Naimark: November 2005 Archives

« October 2005 | Main | December 2005 »

November 24, 2005

NY Times OpEd: "New technologies breed new genres."

In its own little away, an amazing realization by the New York Times today. -M

TV Beyond the Tried and True


What were they waiting for? It's just over a month since the Apple chief executive, Steven Jobs, and Robert Iger, head of Disney, announced that they would be selling hit shows like ABC's "Lost" for viewing on the new iPod. Now it seems like every big company in the industry has come up with a nontraditional twist on delivering television shows - a quantum leap in barely six weeks.

CBS plans to sell reruns of shows like "CSI" on Comcast. NBC Universal will do the same for the likes of "Law & Order: SVU" over DirecTV. Warner Brothers will offer reruns of "Wonder Woman" and "Welcome Back, Kotter" over a new Internet service to those whose nostalgia overcomes their critical faculties. And TiVo just announced that its digital recorders will soon be able to download any show onto Apple's little iPods. The networks and production companies apparently were huddled at the edge of the precipice, waiting for one of them - in this case, the brave Mr. Iger - to jump first.

Piracy was a motivation. Savvy computer users are already using file-sharing technologies like BitTorrent to download illegal copies of shows. The television industry had to come up with a legitimate alternative before too many consumers grew too accustomed to stealing copyrighted material. (Paging the music industry.)

But this is what they came up with? ...
...Reruns of second-rate sitcoms from the 70's and a chance to buy the same shows you can already watch on TV? If the American entertainment conglomerates want to remain among the world leaders, their programmers need to peer over the cubicles of half-hour situation comedies, hourlong police procedurals and two-hour films and explore the unlimited opportunities of the new formats. In the days of Pac-Man and Space Invaders, few would have guessed that a game offering a chance to play out a fake life (the Sims) could ever be a hit. Ten years ago it would have seemed preposterous that cellphone ring tones would be a $5 billion industry. New technologies breed new genres.

Perhaps the future of TV is in brief video clips, the kind workers enjoy e-mailing around the office. These might seem ideal for the atrophied attention spans of young people. (On the other hand, these same young people can lock themselves away for days and even weeks trying to beat a video game.)

Fans could gravitate to watching more of a single program - comfort and consistency in a world of bewildering choices. Loyal viewers certainly would have taken more doses of "Friends" at the show's peak than one half-hour each Thursday.

Ultimately, it will all turn on the willingness of executives to invest in different approaches and greenlight untried ideas. If not, someone else will.

November 21, 2005

Web trends via the Webbys

Nice research. From nettime-l-digest (11/21/05 v01 no1667).
-M

From: olia lialina "olia at profolia dot org"
Subject: "nettime" Webbys reshape the web

To show the web of the 90s and to illustrate the fast growth of the
medium I often use the Webby Awards as an example. To see what sites
were considered to be important and how categories were developing. It
is very interesting to see for example how the category Art/Design in
1997 became net art in 1998, split into arts, broadband and net art in
2001. Then Net Art disappeared in 2005* and reappeared in the list of
the next year. And other interesting transformations.

The most striking were of course the categories of the first year.
The web was still mostly a hobby place. And 15 categories of 1997 were
named like personal interests: Books, Films, Games, Sport, Sex, Money,
others. Web was made by people not corporations.

The webby awards were growing together with appetite of e-businesses,
parallel to authoring tools and the development of plugins. This year
they announced 72 categories. 3 of them have Blog- as prefix (last year
there was category Blog). Many sound really Oscar** like: Best Use of
Animation or Motion Graphics, Best Navigation/Structure or Best Visual
Design. Personal web is dwelling in a Personal Web Site reservate.

Some weeks ago, to make an argument that once the web belonged to
people, I wanted to show nominees and winners of 1997 to the students.
But, to my huge surprise*** they were not there anymore. Though the
award is going to celebrate its 10 years anniversary next year, they've
shortened its history. Now it starts from 1998.
http://webbyawards.com/webbys/winners-1998.php

Archive.org helped to establish historical justice.
http://web.archive.org/web/20000815054325/http://www.webbyawards.com/nominees/noms_n_wins97.html

What was so wrong with this year to remove it? I assume it is the
category Sex which appeared in the list only once, in 1997. Back then
adult content was in the order of things, part of online culture and the
most developed part of the web. It would have been strange to ignore it
and the web reality was still in a state that there was no pressure to
do so.

In later years sex never appeared again as a category, under this or
other names.

Now it is erased. Nothing will remind academics of International Academy
of Digital Arts and Science, sponsors, business owners, graphic
designers, PR managers and other sensitive souls that their online
offices are built only some IP numbers away from the brothel.

It is an assumption only.

olia


- -------------------
*Last year Net.Art category was on their website during the nomination
period, but disappeared when nominees were announced. I don't know how
many artists submitted their work. A diploma student of my did and paid 95$.

**Webby calls itself Online Oscar, The Oscars of the Internet.

***Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very
educated and polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign,
they promissed a *huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the
door open, and the Seven Dwarfs enter...

November 17, 2005

"photo petition"

yeah i know i know i know - political stuff. and significant interactive media...

moveon.jpg

Moveon.org just launched what is probably the first ever "photo petition." Time sensitive (48 hours). Posting them on Flckr here.

"We're aiming to collect thousands of photos of ordinary Americans with homemade signs, asking Congress to oppose the Republican plan to cut services for poor while handing tax breaks to the rich. To make sure you're heard, we'll deliver every photo to every member of Congress before the final vote and run some as online ads in the newspapers Congress reads."

November 15, 2005

$100 laptop

$100laptop.jpg
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Nicholas Negroponte
Unveil $100 Laptop Prototype

Wednesday, November 16, 2005 - 10AM PST

Watch Live Webcast from Tunisia

November 9, 2005

Assignments for Class 13 (Nov 15)

Fish Olympics
Assumptions now are touch-screens for signs, no creation station, and an "arena" screen.
For next week:
1. First pass of a presentable fish kit (5 fish, 5 variables).
2. First pass of presentable games envronments (5), fact-checked.
3. RFID working in Flash.
4. Plans for experience design / game play.
5. Plans for budget expendature.

Fishualization
Assumptions now are live cam, no people drawing but people interaction in ways that help them "see the unseen."
For next week:
1. research digital video processing (e.g., Proccessing, Jitter) to look for additional ideas.
2. research and lock down camera parameters and best placement.
3. design and first-pass demo of interaction possibilities that give people a sense of participation and ownership. Possibilities include whether (and how much) of the fish video to show, whether the trails are actual images of fish or arbitrary trails triggered by tracking fish, etc.
4. Plans for budget expendature.

google jockey

Staking claim has never been a high priority for me (e.g., Michael Naimark 1980 / Tony Oursler 1996 or Michael Naimark 1984 / Michel Gondry 2005 or Michael Naimark (his SFAI class actually) 1989 / Diller+Scofidio 1995 or Michael Naimark 1995 / Jeffrey Shaw 2000 or), but I think I coined the phrase “Google Jockey.”

It was during my 511 seminar, "Globalism and Interactive Media" on 11/17/04. As I was setting up, and Justin Hall was setting up the back channel, I asked for a “GJ” which I had just made up. Some folks got it. I said I needed a "Google Jockey" because I would be talking about a lot of disparate concepts and events. The motivation was as much slackerness as it was doing something new and useful.

November 2, 2005

Assignments for Class 12 (Nov 8)

The general assignment for both teams is to GET SPECIFIC for next week and PRODUCE.

Specific assignments:

Fish Olympics
1 - write specific treatments
2 - check out New England Aquarium fish game and other “build a fish” games
3 - get the RFID technology working
4 - winnow down the big list (equipment, tasks, etc.)
5 - begin design for the presentation, i.e., what you’ll demo and what you’ll simulate

Camera Team
1 - develop Doox applications to see what works best
2 - develop specifics for the rest of the system (touch screens, etc.)
3 - winnow down Fish Symphony, Fish Painting, Fishualization, the garbage idea, etc.
4 - begin design for the presentation, i.e., what you’ll demo and what you’ll simulate

It’s important that both teams think about their presentation. This will lead the budget.

I’ll work to lock down the demo date.