And out it comes...
I am exploring player investment into fantasy worlds and characters because I want to know what makes a player feel they have as meaningful impact on a fantasy environment, in order to make a game where players feel deeply emotionally connected to their experience.
I am developing ways to make death a more meaningful occurrence in videogames, because I feel that death being a minor setback devalues the weight of death. I am doing this in order to amplify a player's connection with game events and the well-being of their characters/avatars.
I am researching economic models in games and how they can convey a political message or provide social commentary to players. This is interesting because these topics can be confusing and complex in real-world terms and offering a way to interact with them in a simplified and fun setting may offer and enhance political or social discussion.
I am exploring romantic love in videogames, because I feel that it is fairly unexplored territory and can provide a strong emotional impact and connection between the player and the game. Successfully eliciting romantic feelings from a player toward another player or NPC would be a great method to significantly enhance a player's connection with the game world.
Comments (5)
Hey RJ. This is awesome. My question is are these supposed to be four separate ideas and if so it seems like ALL of them could actually be combined into a single game - eventually. FANTASY being the backdrop - death in fantasy becoming meaningful if the player is invested (which we are all invested in our fantasies) - political messages can come through in the backstory (i.e. Animal Farm) and romantic love...I'm all for that in video games. I think that love as a motivating factor is not utlized as much as it should be. The strength of Romeo and Juliet as a story for both sexes is hard to deny.
Posted by Maya
|
February 8, 2008 10:31 AM
Posted on February 8, 2008 10:31
Thanks, Maya! I appreciate the comments.
Yes, a lot of my thinking has been revolving around what have become "central themes" for me. I do feel all of these questions could be handled in one game, and I'm sort of heading in that direction. I do want to narrow it down a bit but I suppose that will come in time.
Posted by RJ
|
February 8, 2008 10:33 PM
Posted on February 8, 2008 22:33
I love the idea of meaningful game death. The challenge, I think, will come in balancing making death something you truly want to avoid and making it so harsh that you just stop playing the game. A lot has been done in trying to make NPC death more meaningful...it would be lovely to see avatar death become important as well.
Posted by diana
|
February 9, 2008 3:29 AM
Posted on February 9, 2008 03:29
Seems to me that "meaningful death" need not be synonymous with "harsher penalties for death". It could simply be something that changes the game, thereby rendering it an important event.
I've heard it said (though never verified) that if you die a certain number of times in the dungeons in original Legend of Zelda, the enemy behavior changes. True or not, that's a meaningful consequence of death. I've always thought it would be interesting to do something along these lines: give people a situation where "death" is different than "reset", and has a tangible effect on the world. Hopefully something more profound than a skeleton throwing or not throwing bones in a dungeon, but hey, you need to start somewhere.
Posted by Jamie Antonisse
|
February 9, 2008 12:18 PM
Posted on February 9, 2008 12:18
Interesting Jamie, I'd never heard that about Zelda before. Even if it's not true, it's an interesting idea. Changing the world... that will definitely happen :)
Diana, I agree that it's a big problem. I feel like I might have a grasp on what to do, but it involves playing games in such a different way that I'm not sure how players will react. It's exciting but worrying at the same time.
I have a lot to mention on this subject so I should really just get around to making a post about it.
Posted by RJ
|
February 9, 2008 5:12 PM
Posted on February 9, 2008 17:12